Well, quite literally thinking about the future, not mine, not yours, just the future in general. I mean, what is it? Does it really exist? Is it entirely theory? “Future” is certainly a noun, right? A direct object even. But not really, in my opinion. I think the future which extends beyond the length of your life doesn’t exist. I suppose this is speaking relatively, but I think it could make for a good argument.
First, a little background. The reason this comes up is because we’re starting a project in Design 2 that requires us to invent a symposium (if you will) that is called “The future is not what it used to be.” Here’s the exact project:
“You are hereby provided with a title for a symposium. Basically speaking, you are given the very beginning and a framework - based on your own interests you will furnish content/theme. THE FUTURE IS NOT WHAT IT USED TO BE is a hypothetical symposium - you can make this conference about art, film, fashion, culture, ecology - to name a few possibilities - which are endless.
In relation to this symposium you will design:
01/Visual identity for symposium
02/Poster - to function in flat form and also as a self mailer
03/DVD + CD packaging [these can be two separate items or combined as one package]
04/A short teaser booklet
In implementing and accomplishing the above you need establish a place + time - furnish a paragraph describing intent of symposium and provide names + titles and lecture information etc. Remember you are the designer, the author, the planner and the editor in this project.”
So that’s the whole idea of the project, if that makes any sense. The other part of it is that he wants us to take into consideration the idea of self and time into our process of considering the future. Which lead to me thinking about the future, which is where we started here, see my drift?
So in thinking about the future, I was thinking about it in terms of a philosophical argument sort of symposium. The two sides would be considering the idea of the future as it exists immediately (to you that is, since everyone has a different future for 10 seconds from now), the idea of a future that happens after your life, and the idea that the future doesn’t exist beyond the span of your individual life, since for you, technically, it doesn’t.
To the idea of a future beyond what your lifespan is, I would say, “If a tree falls in the forest and no one hears it, did it make a sound?” And to the idea of a lack of future due to your lack of existence I would say, “Was there no past prior to your birth?” I think there could be steady argument either way on the matter, I mean, of course the tree makes a sound, right? And what if everyone has lied to you about the “past?” I mean, of course it’s entirely a philosophical discussion, but I think if I were going to hold my own symposium I would want to hear some strong, relevant, valid arguments from either side and I would have a lot of fun listening to some philosophers battle it out in lecture form rather than book/article form. Who wouldn’t? This will, of course, make the project that much more difficult for me, but you know, I think the harder it is, the more I will learn from it.
I mean really, why am I paying to be here?